69 Comments
User's avatar
Allen's avatar

The covid campaign was a highly organized undertaking disguised as a public health emergency. This multi-faceted structural event was the culmination of the Deep State’s decades-old determination to institute a raft of invasive policies—including the worldwide suspension of basic civil liberties—to salvage their crumbling financial empire and usher in a complete transformation of society.

The manufactured perception that there was a global medical emergency, beginning in March 2020, was an artifact of mass media manipulation, behavioral conditioning techniques and social engineering.

Fake photos of people falling dead- fake images of coffins piling up- fake doctors claiming hospitals were overflowing- fake tests to produce a fake disease- fake scenes outside hospitals staged by PR firms- fake media parrots lying through their teeth every night- fake trials of a toxic bioweapon- fake everything.

Not only did the “pandemic” narrative serve to conceal the fact that there was a mass murder spree (mainly of the elderly on pensions and the disabled on government assistance) set off by policies constructed, orchestrated, and mandated by identifiable individuals, it also served as a smokescreen for the entire “Covid Operation.”

One of the major components of the covid terror operation was to greatly reduce the gargantuan problem of trillions in unfunded liabilities facing all Western financial systems. This meant eliminating large swathes of disabled and elderly people who rely on government assistance and/or pensions. Orders given throughout Western nations resulted in medical institutions creating incentives and mandates that via the financial instrument of the "health management systems" funneled massive kickbacks into the coffers of large-scale financial investors via the covid death protocols which had the added "benefit" of addressing future liabilities. All of this came about via policy directives that were developed in the top realms of high finance, then passed down via political processes turning them into real world policy.

Put simply, Covid-19 was not a widespread medical emergency it was an Intel operation, a global racketeering scheme, a massive psychological operation and a smoke screen for a complete overhaul and restructuring of the current social and economic world order.

pobrecollie's avatar

"One of the major components of the covid terror operation was to greatly reduce the gargantuan problem of trillions in unfunded liabilities facing all Western financial systems."

This makes sense until you notice that Western governments increased unskilled migration massively during that time period, adding many more dependent on state handouts.

Allen's avatar

That's somewhat of a right-wing talking point here in the US but isn't the reality.

Most of the "illegals" here in the US do not receive government handouts to any significant degree and it is offset by the Social Security slush fund that would go bankrupt if it weren't for the way this slave labor were credentialed through the employment process.

Most people have zero idea about how any of this works but the mythologies are valuable as dog whistle political talking points and to keep people distracted and divided on who the real thieves are.

pobrecollie's avatar

It's definitely the reality in the UK and much of Europe.

Metta's avatar

Well said, Allen. 🎯

Marten's avatar

Hear ya,,and also an plandemic of "cowards"

Marnie1975's avatar

It’s really disturbing the harms that were done by these lies. And NOT ONE soul paid for the hysteria that happened as a cause of it. From police arresting you at grocery stores for not wearing a mask. Citing private property to the insane fights over toilet paper!!!

Teresa N.'s avatar

Absolutely.

Another thing I think the 'pandemic' narrative was designed to cover up is rarely mentioned but significant. Anyone who has read 'The Invisible Rainbow' by Arthur Firstenberg will know what I'm talking about. The book reveals how every time a new technology related to electricity and wireless signals has been rolled out, there has been a 'pandemic' shortly after, a.k.a. our bodies reacting to a new toxic insult. This includes the so-called Spanish Flu. I believe that one of the covid operation's goals was to cover up the pandemic-like effects of the 5G roll out (which the perpetrators would be well aware of) - which is essential to the 'internet of bodies' transhumanist agenda. It also would explain why some people seemed to genuinely have (or observe, in the case of doctors) a real, new illness or severity of flu-like illness, apart from the nocebo effect and iatrogenic harms.

Allen's avatar

I have to push back on your comment in both examples.

I've written what is probably the most comprehensive article to date on the Spanish Flu and in doing so did an extraordinary amount of research that would be difficult to capture in full.

The notion that the newly installed electric lines had anything to do with the Spanish Flu (which does not exist) is patently and demonstrably false. The primary culprit of the "Spanish Flu" was the impact of everything involved in WW1- I will leave it at that.

It is also patently false that 5G had anything to do with COVID casualties (and 5G is toxic) it was mass murder via protocols and assorted brutalities of the medical industry and social order.

There was no new illness anywhere.

Teresa N.'s avatar

Sigh... this is why I rarely post comments - no matter how clear I try to make them they get misread. I didn't write what you said I wrote. And I fully agree with your original comment.

1) Have you read Firstenberg's book? 2) I never said newly installed electric lines were related to the Spanish Flu. The tech in that case WAS part of WWI (military), so it is compatible with your conclusions. 3) I didn't say 5G was causing covid casualties, only that covid was a convenient cover up for the effects of toxic 5G. 4) Since no one can be everywhere at all times it's not possible to know if there was any new illness or what was misinterpreted as such. Also since the nocebo effect is a real thing, that could create a new illness in itself.

Food for thought. :)

Andrew N's avatar

What a fantastic article and great examples, I think you would enjoy reading the following article

https://medicinegirl.substack.com/p/the-carbon-cage

The translator system does not stay in cosmology. It shows up most clearly in everyday life, where people believe they are making informed choices while quietly following interpretations handed to them. The most familiar example is medicine, where numbers are presented as objective facts, but meaning is added afterward by an authority figure who tells you what those numbers signify and what actions they require.

A lab report is a sheet of paper containing measurements. The numbers themselves do not issue commands. They do not carry any weight. They do not tell you what kind of person you are or what drug to take next. That part arrives later, through interpretation. High cholesterol is translated as danger, irresponsibility, and a bad genetic profile. Low values on a 25D vitamin D chemical profile are interpreted as deficiency, risk, and impending disease. Once the translation is accepted, the solution is immediately framed as an intervention, usually in the form of drugs, supplements, or lifestyle mandates designed to move the number toward an approved range.

The critical point is not whether the number changes. It is who owns the meaning of the number. The patient is never taught to question how the range was established, what assumptions built it, or how variable human biology actually is. The patient is not asked to interpret their own experience or context. They are told what the number means, and the meaning is treated as instruction. Compliance becomes the measure of intelligence and responsibility, while questioning the interpretation is framed as ignorance or conspiracy. Remember, the industry is simply looking for cheap chemicals that change a blood lab value. THEN they figure out a story to go with it to sell back to you. Statin drugs, Vitamin D3, Vitamin B12, don’t matter the chemical. They simply change values so you beLIEve the story that they are working.

This system trains people to obey conclusions without understanding the framework that produced them. The number becomes a verdict only because an external authority assigns it one. Over time, people stop trusting their own perception of health and begin trusting abstract metrics instead. A person who feels well can be told they are sick. A person who feels unwell can be told they are fine. Reality is no longer anchored in experience but in interpretation. You can’t hate the PCR test while bowing to the Vitamin D3 levels. ITS THE SAME THING.

Once this structure is accepted at the level of personal health, it becomes easier to apply it elsewhere. People learn that they are not expected to understand systems; they are only expected to accept explanations. They learn that meaning flows downward from credentialed sources and that disagreement is not a difference of reasoning but a failure to submit to them. This conditioning does not feel coercive because it is presented as care, expertise, and protection, but the mechanism is the same. Stated more simply: We don’t have the credentials to have an opinion.

Nick Hudson's avatar

Perceptive remarks that I'd suggest extending. Can we assert that nobody has credentials in complex domains? I've become more and more skeptical about claims made in the domains of clinical medicine and health more generally, arriving at a point where I minimize engagement with the industry—no tests, no injections, no pills; something resembling a diverse paleo diet with sun and exercise; and no expectations of silver bullets.

Martin Enlund's avatar

Frank Knight drew a sharp distinction between risk and genuine (Knightian) uncertainty back in 1921: risk is something that we can calculate (like the likelihood of 6s when throwing a fair dice). Genuine uncertainty is when we cannot even guess the probabilities.

When it comes to complex systems of the second order (Stephen Wolfram's concept of computational irreducibility also comes to mind), well, we really can’t have any clear view of the actual probabilities. Too many agents, a myriad of ongoing changes, and a complex web of interconnectedness, much worse than even a thorny bramble bush.

Credentialism is applicable when we are faced with complicated questions, not really with complex systems of the second order, I think (also see Dave Snowden’s Cynefin framework for more on these distinctions).

Not that the power elite wish to recognise anything like this, though…

Astragale's avatar

“I minimize engagement with the industry—no tests, no injections, no pills”.

Same.

David the Tree Man's avatar

Dude - your depth and breadth of understanding just about everything is superlative.

Ann Glover's avatar

Once you see it, you can't unsee it.

As for Artificial Intelligence - more like Averaged Stupidity.

Kittykat's avatar

The first global problem that helped the UN bureaucracy grow substantially was the Ozone hole. There was also substantial disagreement with the theory that CFC’s caused an ozone hole. DuPont who made Freon was initially a critic however turned completely a few years later. The UN was then enlisted in the effort to ban Freon globally just as DuPont’s Freon patent was expiring making way for its new patented successor. The ozone theory also required suppression of dissenting views. The ozone issue rocketed the UN into public consciousness, allowed it to acquire a substantial increase in funding, and was lauded for saving the world. —Invisible global problem-censorship-global solution- powerful few —Fits the pattern exactly.

csofand's avatar

Nick you are very insightful. Thank you for this great explanation of what is going on, how our "handlers" are pushing us into our cages.

Since you are an actuary, I would be most interested what you might think about some research I am doing looking at pension plans here in the US for evidence of harm caused by the mandates.

I am not an actuary, just a former public employee that left my county job to get away from the madness. So it would be most helpful to get an assessment from someone with experience.

Nick Hudson's avatar

Very happy to help, although my knowledge of the ins and outs of US plans has faded somewhat since I co-authored this: https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jacrfn/v15y2003i4p51-57.html

csofand's avatar

Thank you Nick! I do not want to take up a lot of your time, but one thing that is puzzling me is the inordinately large investment returns that many pension plans here in the US saw for FY2021. I stumbled across this fact by accident as I was looking at other mortality statistics in some recent pension reports. If you have the time to look at a couple of my recent posts about this and let me know if you have any insights that would be most appreciated.

https://open.substack.com/pub/csofand/p/your-money-and-your-life?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

https://open.substack.com/pub/csofand/p/let-it-ride?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

Thank you!

currer's avatar

I have copied your comments to Jon Beaudoin.

John, are you aware of this substack writer? I have a feeling his work might be of interest to you. https://csofand.substack.com/p/your-money-and-your-life https://csofand.substack.com/p/let-it-ride He relates pension actuarial savings to state death statistics with very interesting results.

https://therealcdc.substack.com/p/gorsuch-v-pareto/comment/199367248

csofand's avatar

Thanks for the referral currer!

I will go look at John's posts.

I greatly appreciate your interest. I would be curious to know if you have any insight regarding those huge investment gains most pension plans saw in 2021, as large numbers of their members were dying.

Astragale's avatar

This may be way off base but is it the case that if people die without having named a beneficiary to their pension plan, the company keeps the cash?

And young people were dying after the shots.

When I was in my thirties I had pension plans but hadn’t got round to naming a beneficiary because I didn’t think I was likely to die…

csofand's avatar

Hello Astrogale. No, the pension would go to a set defined "order of precedence" or hierarchy of relatives. Lacking any clear person in the family, it may go to the estate and possibly enter the probate process. Good question though!

currer's avatar

Have you seen this report from 2007?

It reveals how central Finance is to pandemic planning.

https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/niac-pandemic-outbreak-final-report-01-17-07-508.pdf

NATIONAL INFRASTRTUCTURE ADVISORY COUNCIL

THE PRIORITIZATION OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A PANDEMIC OUTBREAK IN THE UNITED STATES WORKING GROUP FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE COUNCIL

January 16, 2007

Look at the section on the Banking and Finance Sector committee - the report tells us they had their "pandemic" plan in place in January 2006 - so the LEADING PLANNERS for the Covid-lockdowns and fascist policies were the bankers. It is a banking bailout by stealth.

The repo markets are in crisis again this month, the last time was in September 2019

Fed Quietly Injects $125 Billion in Repo Market

Posted Nov 12, 2025 by Martin Armstrong https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/economics/fed-quietly-injects-125-billion-in-repo-market/

This paragraph from the 2007 INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT - (page 54)

"The sector envisioned the Forum as a venue for FSSCC members with active avian flu working groups or currently researching this issue to collaborate and share information.

The FSSCC also designed the Forum to develop and communicate information and strategies FSSCC members and their member organizations to use in preparation for an avian influenza pandemic or other infectious disease outbreak.

csofand's avatar

Wow!

That is an excellent find. I had not heard of that. Thank you for calling it to my attention currer. This makes sense. I think covid stacked a lot of functions for these monsters, financial reset high on the list. In my gut I believe those huge investment gains showered on the pension plans in 2021 were part of that.

currer's avatar

No I have no finance background. I had a feeling Beaudoin may be able to provide some insights as he has been analysing the pattern of deaths by state.

currer's avatar

Thanks for these links csofand, they are very good.

csofand's avatar

Thank you currer! Glad to know somebody new appreciates this stuff.

DG's avatar

Welcome to the stack. When I came across it several years ago, there was much to be found of worth. Not so much anymore. Nice to see a new and real voice here again. There are many, really, but much harder to find. Glad I found you. I've been on page with these 3 topics for some years now. Thank you.

pobrecollie's avatar

Statins and mRNA vaccines are basically a party trick.

Take a statin and it will lower your cholesterol levels.

Take a covid vaccine and you can spike antibody levels.

Both of these outcomes are used as surrogate endpoints, without actually examining whether they affect the actual endpoint that you should be looking at - reduce your change of heart disease or stop you catching / dying from "covid". (And that's ignoring possible side effects which ought to be taken into account.)

Pleased to hear my mum convinced my dad to come off of statins. And apparently he went out hillwalking and his recently developed leg pain had improved after coming off of them.

What a joke modern medicine and a lot of science is.

Astragale's avatar

“Trust your eyes and ears in real life”.

Exactly how I realized the pandemic was a lie.

After a few weeks of fear, I remarked to my partner that if the news wasn’t talking 24/7 about the pandemic, we’d have no idea it was happening…

We didn’t know anyone who got unusually ill. Or anyone hospitalized. Or anyone who died. I remarked that if people weren’t wearing masks outside (mandated) everything would look completely normal because after the first lockdown everyone was going around town normally.

After those observations, the penny dropped fast! Everything looked normal, because everything WAS normal. They imposed the masks so it *looked like* something must be wrong. They imposed the lockdowns for various reasons but one was certainly to try and isolate us from each other…so we wouldn’t notice there was no pandemic.

But people have a hard time resisting propaganda. Last year I discussed all this with a young relative. She was horrified when I said there’d been no pandemic. “But all the people who died!” she said.

I asked if she knew the average age of those who died?

It was 83. The same people who would have died of the flu, bronchitis, pneumonia…

I asked how many people SHE knew who had died. She thought for a while then reluctantly said: “One”.

How old? In his 80s…

It was all a lie.

Did they manipulate & release some pathogen? Wouldn’t be a bit surprised. But did it whip round the entire world in 6 weeks, just newly ‘adapted’ to infect humans?

It was all a lie.

They wanted us to believe it was global because then - as the villain Gates says - they could say it was necessary to “vaccinate the entire planet”.

Power in this world has been hijacked by a GLOBAL CRIME SYNDICATE.

Jerry Kelly's avatar

Look/listen closely to the media event during which the WHO ‘declared’ COVID-19 a pandemic. Tedros does not use the word ‘declare’ in the pronouncement, but the approximate phrase ‘can be characterized as’. He talks about not taking the issue lightly and using words carefully. He did so.

So, who (which agents) did the characterizing of Covid-19 as a pandemic? Everyone but the WHO, and especially those who asserted that the WHO itself declared the pandemic. Genius.

Fabius's avatar

A+ for pattern recognition

Metta's avatar

Always appreciate your keen and articulate insights!

Robert Dyson's avatar

I never took to the 'bad' cholesterol idea but CO2 & climate I accepted for a long time though I had the theoretical background to work through the physics. Covid-19 was my big wake up. From the illness statistics on the Diamond Princess cruise ship it was obvious that nothing special was happening. Masks and lockdown obviously caused problems that even that WHO admitted was a pointless measure in the past. I did get caught up in the zoonotic vs GOF lab leak for a while. Then the banning and denigration of off label meds for respiratory illness like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, that may just have a placebo effect in making people feel better but in low dose are safe though I guess they have anti-inflammatory properties, triggered the realisation that the whole thing was a scam and did not need any novel pathogen. That's when I started on the 'climate change' study because someone online was contesting the CO2 narrative and I thought that I would explain properly (I initially thought about this in the 1950s when in UK 6th form). Fortunately I decided that I would study the research in depth and work through the physics. I bought a book on atmospheric physics just to make sure that I understood the complex processes involved (as an undergraduate I went to lectures by John Houghton but didn't take much interest). I am enjoying this study but it was a shock to find a lot of spin (to put it politely), little substance and some odd physics. I am all for insulating buildings in cold countries, having affordable rental accommodation, like the UK had lots of council housing, so that people can easily move to a new place of work and reduce commuting, only buying when they feel settled. I am all for research on different energy sources and energy storage. I am a proponent of nuclear fission power where in China they now have a prototype thorium reactor. I support nuclear fusion research but don’t see much hope in it – though maybe it gets promoted to allow easier shutdown of current fission reactors that work for that pie in the sky soon (of course the pie is there, our very own sun). This is another agenda of fear – global war, depleted uranium shells etc. seem to be OK but the miniscule risk of death from fission reactors is totally unacceptable. Time to stop, too long already.

Chris's avatar

👍👍

Chris's avatar

👍😁

Mike Kennedy's avatar

I remember discovering PANDA in 2021, the website was listed at the bottom of the first leaflets our Stand in the Park group distributed, the safer to wait leaflet warning parents not to inject the snake oil into their children, I like to think we saved some lives.

The PANDA website was a gold mine of easy to understand information about the scam.

My sincere thanks to you and your colleague's Nick, there are a small number of global heroes speaking the truth at great personal risk, you are one, as is Dr Mike Yeadon.

God bless you.

Eric M's avatar

Just seeing this now on Boxing Day, Nick. Well done and succinct as usual, thankee. Will pass along!

Eric

Dawn James's avatar

As always, you explain everything so clearly. Thank you Nick.